rust/tests/ui/indexing_slicing.rs

85 lines
2.5 KiB
Rust
Raw Normal View History

2018-07-28 17:34:52 +02:00
#![feature(tool_lints)]
2018-03-16 09:44:20 +01:00
#![feature(plugin)]
2018-07-28 17:34:52 +02:00
#![warn(clippy::indexing_slicing)]
#![warn(clippy::out_of_bounds_indexing)]
#![allow(clippy::no_effect, clippy::unnecessary_operation)]
2015-12-21 19:22:29 +01:00
fn main() {
Extend `indexing_slicing` lint Hey there clippy team! I've made some assumptions in this PR and I'm not at all certain they'll look like the right approach to you. I'm looking forward to any feedback or revision requests you have, thanks! Prior to this commit the `indexing_slicing` lint was limited to indexing/slicing operations on arrays. This meant that the scope of a really useful lint didn't include vectors. In order to include vectors in the `indexing_slicing` lint a few steps were taken. The `array_indexing.rs` source file in `clippy_lints` was renamed to `indexing_slicing.rs` to more accurately reflect the lint's new scope. The `OUT_OF_BOUNDS_INDEXING` lint persists through these changes so if we can know that a constant index or slice on an array is in bounds no lint is triggered. The `array_indexing` tests in the `tests/ui` directory were also extended and moved to `indexing_slicing.rs` and `indexing_slicing.stderr`. The `indexing_slicing` lint was moved to the `clippy_pedantic` lint group. A specific "Consider using" string was added to each of the `indexing_slicing` lint reports. At least one of the test scenarios might look peculiar and I'll leave it up to y'all to decide if it's palatable. It's the result of indexing the array `x` after `let x = [1, 2, 3, 4];` ``` error: slicing may panic. Consider using `.get(..n)`or `.get_mut(..n)`instead --> $DIR/indexing_slicing.rs:23:6 | 23 | &x[0..][..3]; | ^^^^^^^^^^^ ``` The error string reports only on the second half's range-to, because the range-from is in bounds! Again, thanks for taking a look. Closes #2536
2018-05-23 06:56:02 +02:00
let x = [1, 2, 3, 4];
let index: usize = 1;
let index_from: usize = 2;
let index_to: usize = 3;
x[index];
&x[index..];
&x[..index];
&x[index_from..index_to];
&x[index_from..][..index_to]; // Two lint reports, one for [index_from..] and another for [..index_to].
x[4]; // Ok, let rustc's `const_err` lint handle `usize` indexing on arrays.
x[1 << 3]; // Ok, let rustc's `const_err` lint handle `usize` indexing on arrays.
2017-09-28 19:40:19 +02:00
&x[..=4];
&x[1..5];
&x[5..][..10]; // Two lint reports, one for [5..] and another for [..10].
2017-02-08 14:58:07 +01:00
&x[5..];
&x[..5];
&x[5..].iter().map(|x| 2 * x).collect::<Vec<i32>>();
&x[0..=4];
&x[0..][..3];
&x[1..][..5];
&x[4..]; // Ok, should not produce stderr.
&x[..4]; // Ok, should not produce stderr.
&x[..]; // Ok, should not produce stderr.
&x[1..]; // Ok, should not produce stderr.
&x[2..].iter().map(|x| 2 * x).collect::<Vec<i32>>(); // Ok, should not produce stderr.
&x[0..].get(..3); // Ok, should not produce stderr.
x[0]; // Ok, should not produce stderr.
x[3]; // Ok, should not produce stderr.
&x[0..3]; // Ok, should not produce stderr.
let y = &x;
2017-02-08 14:58:07 +01:00
y[0];
&y[1..2];
2017-09-28 19:40:19 +02:00
&y[0..=4];
&y[..=4];
&y[..]; // Ok, should not produce stderr.
let empty: [i8; 0] = [];
empty[0]; // Ok, let rustc's `const_err` lint handle `usize` indexing on arrays.
2017-02-08 14:58:07 +01:00
&empty[1..5];
2017-09-28 19:40:19 +02:00
&empty[0..=4];
&empty[..=4];
2017-02-08 14:58:07 +01:00
&empty[1..];
&empty[..4];
&empty[0..=0];
&empty[..=0];
&empty[0..]; // Ok, should not produce stderr.
&empty[0..0]; // Ok, should not produce stderr.
&empty[..0]; // Ok, should not produce stderr.
&empty[..]; // Ok, should not produce stderr.
Extend `indexing_slicing` lint Hey there clippy team! I've made some assumptions in this PR and I'm not at all certain they'll look like the right approach to you. I'm looking forward to any feedback or revision requests you have, thanks! Prior to this commit the `indexing_slicing` lint was limited to indexing/slicing operations on arrays. This meant that the scope of a really useful lint didn't include vectors. In order to include vectors in the `indexing_slicing` lint a few steps were taken. The `array_indexing.rs` source file in `clippy_lints` was renamed to `indexing_slicing.rs` to more accurately reflect the lint's new scope. The `OUT_OF_BOUNDS_INDEXING` lint persists through these changes so if we can know that a constant index or slice on an array is in bounds no lint is triggered. The `array_indexing` tests in the `tests/ui` directory were also extended and moved to `indexing_slicing.rs` and `indexing_slicing.stderr`. The `indexing_slicing` lint was moved to the `clippy_pedantic` lint group. A specific "Consider using" string was added to each of the `indexing_slicing` lint reports. At least one of the test scenarios might look peculiar and I'll leave it up to y'all to decide if it's palatable. It's the result of indexing the array `x` after `let x = [1, 2, 3, 4];` ``` error: slicing may panic. Consider using `.get(..n)`or `.get_mut(..n)`instead --> $DIR/indexing_slicing.rs:23:6 | 23 | &x[0..][..3]; | ^^^^^^^^^^^ ``` The error string reports only on the second half's range-to, because the range-from is in bounds! Again, thanks for taking a look. Closes #2536
2018-05-23 06:56:02 +02:00
let v = vec![0; 5];
v[0];
v[10];
v[1 << 3];
Extend `indexing_slicing` lint Hey there clippy team! I've made some assumptions in this PR and I'm not at all certain they'll look like the right approach to you. I'm looking forward to any feedback or revision requests you have, thanks! Prior to this commit the `indexing_slicing` lint was limited to indexing/slicing operations on arrays. This meant that the scope of a really useful lint didn't include vectors. In order to include vectors in the `indexing_slicing` lint a few steps were taken. The `array_indexing.rs` source file in `clippy_lints` was renamed to `indexing_slicing.rs` to more accurately reflect the lint's new scope. The `OUT_OF_BOUNDS_INDEXING` lint persists through these changes so if we can know that a constant index or slice on an array is in bounds no lint is triggered. The `array_indexing` tests in the `tests/ui` directory were also extended and moved to `indexing_slicing.rs` and `indexing_slicing.stderr`. The `indexing_slicing` lint was moved to the `clippy_pedantic` lint group. A specific "Consider using" string was added to each of the `indexing_slicing` lint reports. At least one of the test scenarios might look peculiar and I'll leave it up to y'all to decide if it's palatable. It's the result of indexing the array `x` after `let x = [1, 2, 3, 4];` ``` error: slicing may panic. Consider using `.get(..n)`or `.get_mut(..n)`instead --> $DIR/indexing_slicing.rs:23:6 | 23 | &x[0..][..3]; | ^^^^^^^^^^^ ``` The error string reports only on the second half's range-to, because the range-from is in bounds! Again, thanks for taking a look. Closes #2536
2018-05-23 06:56:02 +02:00
&v[10..100];
&x[10..][..100]; // Two lint reports, one for [10..] and another for [..100].
Extend `indexing_slicing` lint Hey there clippy team! I've made some assumptions in this PR and I'm not at all certain they'll look like the right approach to you. I'm looking forward to any feedback or revision requests you have, thanks! Prior to this commit the `indexing_slicing` lint was limited to indexing/slicing operations on arrays. This meant that the scope of a really useful lint didn't include vectors. In order to include vectors in the `indexing_slicing` lint a few steps were taken. The `array_indexing.rs` source file in `clippy_lints` was renamed to `indexing_slicing.rs` to more accurately reflect the lint's new scope. The `OUT_OF_BOUNDS_INDEXING` lint persists through these changes so if we can know that a constant index or slice on an array is in bounds no lint is triggered. The `array_indexing` tests in the `tests/ui` directory were also extended and moved to `indexing_slicing.rs` and `indexing_slicing.stderr`. The `indexing_slicing` lint was moved to the `clippy_pedantic` lint group. A specific "Consider using" string was added to each of the `indexing_slicing` lint reports. At least one of the test scenarios might look peculiar and I'll leave it up to y'all to decide if it's palatable. It's the result of indexing the array `x` after `let x = [1, 2, 3, 4];` ``` error: slicing may panic. Consider using `.get(..n)`or `.get_mut(..n)`instead --> $DIR/indexing_slicing.rs:23:6 | 23 | &x[0..][..3]; | ^^^^^^^^^^^ ``` The error string reports only on the second half's range-to, because the range-from is in bounds! Again, thanks for taking a look. Closes #2536
2018-05-23 06:56:02 +02:00
&v[10..];
&v[..100];
&v[..]; // Ok, should not produce stderr.
//
// Continue tests at end function to minimize the changes to this file's corresponding stderr.
//
const N: usize = 15; // Out of bounds
const M: usize = 3; // In bounds
x[N]; // Ok, let rustc's `const_err` lint handle `usize` indexing on arrays.
x[M]; // Ok, should not produce stderr.
v[N];
v[M];
2015-12-21 19:22:29 +01:00
}