2fdd95c1c8
function scope. This removes one of the last few cases where we build expressions in the wrong function scope context. No functionality change intended. llvm-svn: 362178
89 lines
3.4 KiB
Plaintext
89 lines
3.4 KiB
Plaintext
// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -triple x86_64-apple-darwin10 -analyzer-checker=core -fblocks -analyzer-opt-analyze-nested-blocks -verify -x objective-c++ %s
|
|
// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -std=c++11 -analyzer-checker=core,debug.DumpCFG -fblocks -analyzer-opt-analyze-nested-blocks -analyzer-config cfg-rich-constructors=false %s > %t 2>&1
|
|
// RUN: FileCheck --input-file=%t -check-prefixes=CHECK,WARNINGS %s
|
|
// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -std=c++11 -analyzer-checker=core,debug.DumpCFG -fblocks -analyzer-opt-analyze-nested-blocks -analyzer-config cfg-rich-constructors=true %s > %t 2>&1
|
|
// RUN: FileCheck --input-file=%t -check-prefixes=CHECK,ANALYZER %s
|
|
|
|
// This file tests how we construct two different flavors of the Clang CFG -
|
|
// the CFG used by the Sema analysis-based warnings and the CFG used by the
|
|
// static analyzer. The difference in the behavior is checked via FileCheck
|
|
// prefixes (WARNINGS and ANALYZER respectively). When introducing new analyzer
|
|
// flags, no new run lines should be added - just these flags would go to the
|
|
// respective line depending on where is it turned on and where is it turned
|
|
// off. Feel free to add tests that test only one of the CFG flavors if you're
|
|
// not sure how the other flavor is supposed to work in your case.
|
|
|
|
// expected-no-diagnostics
|
|
|
|
void testBlockWithoutCopyExpression(int i) {
|
|
// Captures i, with no copy expression.
|
|
(void)(^void() {
|
|
(void)i;
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-LABEL:void testBlockWithoutCopyExpression(int i)
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: [B2 (ENTRY)]
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B1
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B1]
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 1: ^{ }
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: (void)([B1.1]) (CStyleCastExpr, ToVoid, void)
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B2
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B0
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B0 (EXIT)]
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B1
|
|
|
|
struct StructWithCopyConstructor {
|
|
StructWithCopyConstructor(int i);
|
|
StructWithCopyConstructor(const StructWithCopyConstructor &s);
|
|
};
|
|
void testBlockWithCopyExpression(StructWithCopyConstructor s) {
|
|
// Captures s, with a copy expression calling the copy constructor for StructWithCopyConstructor.
|
|
(void)(^void() {
|
|
(void)s;
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-LABEL:void testBlockWithCopyExpression(StructWithCopyConstructor s)
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: [B2 (ENTRY)]
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B1
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B1]
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 1: s
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: [B1.1] (ImplicitCastExpr, NoOp, const struct StructWithCopyConstructor)
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: [B1.2] (CXXConstructExpr, const struct StructWithCopyConstructor)
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 4: ^{ }
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 5: (void)([B1.4]) (CStyleCastExpr, ToVoid, void)
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B2
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B0
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B0 (EXIT)]
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B1
|
|
|
|
void testBlockWithCaptureByReference() {
|
|
__block StructWithCopyConstructor s(5);
|
|
// Captures s by reference, so no copy expression.
|
|
(void)(^void() {
|
|
(void)s;
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-LABEL:void testBlockWithCaptureByReference()
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: [B2 (ENTRY)]
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B1
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B1]
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 1: 5
|
|
// WARNINGS-NEXT: 2: [B1.1] (CXXConstructExpr, struct StructWithCopyConstructor)
|
|
// ANALYZER-NEXT: 2: [B1.1] (CXXConstructExpr, [B1.3], struct StructWithCopyConstructor)
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: StructWithCopyConstructor s(5) __attribute__((blocks("byref")));
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 4: ^{ }
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 5: (void)([B1.4]) (CStyleCastExpr, ToVoid, void)
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B2
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B0
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B0 (EXIT)]
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B1
|