698568b74c
I wouldn't recommend writing code like the testcase; a function parameter isn't atomic, so using an atomic type doesn't really make sense. But it's valid, so clang shouldn't crash on it. The code was assuming hasAggregateEvaluationKind(Ty) implies Ty is a RecordType, which isn't true. Just use isRecordType() instead. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102015
28 lines
840 B
C++
28 lines
840 B
C++
// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -emit-llvm -o - -triple=i686-apple-darwin9 | FileCheck %s
|
|
|
|
namespace PR11411 {
|
|
template<typename _Tp> struct Ptr {
|
|
void f();
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-LABEL: define linkonce_odr void @_ZN7PR114113PtrIiE1fEv
|
|
// CHECK-NOT: ret
|
|
template<typename _Tp> inline void Ptr<_Tp>::f() {
|
|
int* _refcount;
|
|
// CHECK: atomicrmw add i32* {{.*}} seq_cst, align 4
|
|
__sync_fetch_and_add(_refcount, 1);
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: ret void
|
|
}
|
|
void f(Ptr<int> *a) { a->f(); }
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
namespace DelegatingParameter {
|
|
// Check that we're delegating the complete ctor to the base
|
|
// ctor, and that doesn't crash.
|
|
// CHECK-LABEL: define void @_ZN19DelegatingParameter1SC1EU7_AtomicNS_1ZE
|
|
// CHECK: call void @_ZN19DelegatingParameter1SC2EU7_AtomicNS_1ZE
|
|
struct Z { int z[100]; };
|
|
struct S { S(_Atomic Z); };
|
|
S::S(_Atomic Z) {}
|
|
}
|