The re-land fixes module map module dependencies seen on Greendragon, but
not in the clang test suite.
---
Currently we only implement this for the Itanium ABI since the correct
mangling for the initializers in other ABIs is not yet known.
Intended result:
For a module interface [which includes partition interface and implementation
units] (instead of the generic CXX initializer) we emit a module init that:
- wraps the contained initializations in a control variable to ensure that
the inits only happen once, even if a module is imported many times by
imports of the main unit.
- calls module initializers for imported modules first. Note that the
order of module import is not significant, and therefore neither is the
order of imported module initializers.
- We then call initializers for the Global Module Fragment (if present)
- We then call initializers for the current module.
- We then call initializers for the Private Module Fragment (if present)
For a module implementation unit, or a non-module TU that imports at least one
module we emit a regular CXX init that:
- Calls the initializers for any imported modules first.
- Then proceeds as normal with remaining inits.
For all module unit kinds we include a global constructor entry, this allows
for the (in most cases unusual) possibility that a module object could be
included in a final binary without a specific call to its initializer.
Implementation:
- We provide the module pointer in the AST Context so that CodeGen can act
on it and its sub-modules.
- We need to account for module build lines like this:
` clang -cc1 -std=c++20 Foo.pcm -emit-obj -o Foo.o` or
` clang -cc1 -std=c++20 -xc++-module Foo.cpp -emit-obj -o Foo.o`
- in order to do this, we add to ParseAST to set the module pointer in
the ASTContext, once we establish that this is a module build and we
know the module pointer. To be able to do this, we make the query for
current module public in Sema.
- In CodeGen, we determine if the current build requires a CXX20-style module
init and, if so, we defer any module initializers during the "Eagerly
Emitted" phase.
- We then walk the module initializers at the end of the TU but before
emitting deferred inits (which adds any hidden and static ones, fixing
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/51873 ).
- We then proceed to emit the deferred inits and continue to emit the CXX
init function.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126189
- the grammar ambiguity is eliminated by a guard;
- modify the guard function signatures, now all parameters are folded in
to a single object, avoid a long parameter list (as we will add more
parameters in the near future);
Reviewed By: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130160
This patch adds support for evaluating expressions which reference
a captured `this` from within the context of a C++ lambda expression.
Currently LLDB doesn't provide Clang with enough information to
determine that we're inside a lambda expression and are allowed to
access variables on a captured `this`; instead Clang simply fails
to parse the expression.
There are two problems to solve here:
1. Make sure `clang::Sema` doesn't reject the expression due to an
illegal member access.
2. Materialize all the captured variables/member variables required
to evaluate the expression.
To address (1), we currently import the outer structure's AST context
onto `$__lldb_class`, making the `contextClass` and the `NamingClass`
match, a requirement by `clang::Sema::BuildPossibleImplicitMemberExpr`.
To address (2), we inject all captured variables as locals into the
expression source code.
**Testing**
* Added API test
This is required in preparation for the follow-up patch which adds
support for evaluating expressions from within C++ lambdas. In such
cases we need to materialize variables which are not part of the
current frame but instead are ivars on a 'this' pointer of the current
frame.
Lower F08 shift (shiftl, shiftr, shifta) and combined shift (dshiftl, dshiftr)
intrinsics. The combined shift intrinsics are implemented using the
definitions of shiftl and shiftr as described by the standard.
For non-conformant arguments to the shift intrinsics, the implementation tries
to replicate the behavior of other compilers if most of the other behave
consistently.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129316
Lower F08 bit population count intrinsics popcnt, poppar, leadz and trailz. popcnt, leadz and trailz are implemented using the corresponding MLIR math intrinsics. poppar is implemented in terms of popcnt.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129584
If a function is non-recursive we only performed intra-procedural
reasoning for reachability (via AA::isPotentiallyReachable). However,
if it is re-entrant that doesn't mean we can't reach. Instead of this
problematic logic in the reachability reasoning we utilize logic in
AAPointerInfo. If a location is for sure written by a function it can
be re-entrant or recursive we know only intra-procedural reasoning is
sufficient.
The existing code doesn't expect dummy values (undef, poison, null-derived
constants etc) as arguments of these intrinsics. However, they can be there
in unreached code. Currently we fail trying to find base for them.
Handle these cases separately. Return null as base for them to be consistent
with the handling in the main algorithm in findBaseDefiningValue.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129561
Reviewed By: apilipenko
Add affine.if canonicalization to compose affine.apply ops into its set
and operands. This eliminates affine.apply ops feeding into affine.if
ops.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130242
If we have a dominating must-write access we do not need to know the
initial value of some object to perform reasoning about the potential
values. The dominating must-write has overwritten the initial value.
lowerGlobalAddress added by D128427 can be used for PIC. The actual condition is
that the global value needs to be dso_local (a dso_preemptable one needs GOT
indirection).
load-store.ll has UB due to out-of-bounds load/store. Fix the UB in the variable
test and add an array test. Note: NOPIC array index is currently wrong.
Reviewed By: wangleiat
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129977
Diagnostic for `-Wauto-import` shouldn't be a warning because it doesn't
represent a potential problem in code that should be fixed. And the
emitted fix-it is likely to trigger `-Watimport-in-framework-header`
which makes it challenging to have a warning-free codebase. But it is
still useful to see how include directives are translated into modular
imports and which module a header belongs to, that's why keep it as a remark.
Keep `-Wauto-import` for now to allow a gradual migration for codebases
using `-Wno-auto-import`, e.g., `-Weverything -Wno-auto-import`.
rdar://79594287
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130138
Using invalidated vector iterator is at best a UB and could crash depending on STL implementation.
Fixing via minimal changes to preserve the existing code style.
Coverity warning 1454828 (scan.coverity.com)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130312
Correct the logic used to set `ATOMIC_*_LOCK_FREE` preprocessor macros not
to rely on the ABI alignment of types. Instead, just assume all those
types are aligned correctly by default since clang uses safe alignment
for `_Atomic` types even if the underlying types are aligned to a lower
boundary by default.
For example, the `long long` and `double` types on x86 are aligned to
32-bit boundary by default. However, `_Atomic long long` and `_Atomic
double` are aligned to 64-bit boundary, therefore satisfying
the requirements of lock-free atomic operations.
This fixes PR #19355 by correcting the value of
`__GCC_ATOMIC_LLONG_LOCK_FREE` on x86, and therefore also fixing
the assumption made in libc++ tests. This also fixes PR #30581 by
applying a consistent logic between the functions used to implement
both interfaces.
Reviewed By: hfinkel, efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28213
The default host CPU for an i386 triple is typically at least an i586,
which has cmpxchg8b (Clang feature, "cx8"). Therefore,
`__CLANG_ATOMIC_LLONG_LOCK_FREE` is 2 on the host, but the value should
be 1 for the device.
Also, grep for `__CLANG_ATOMIC_*` instead of `__GCC_ATOMIC_*`. The CLANG
macros are always emitted, but the GCC macros are omitted for the
*-windows-msvc targets. The `__GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP` macro
always has GCC in its name, not CLANG, however.
Reviewed By: tra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127465
The patch adds SPIRVPrepareFunctions pass, which modifies function
signatures containing aggregate arguments and/or return values before
IR translation. Information about the original signatures is stored in
metadata. It is used during call lowering to restore correct SPIR-V types
of function arguments and return values. This pass also substitutes some
llvm intrinsic calls to function calls, generating the necessary functions
in the module, as the SPIRV translator does.
The patch also includes changes in other modules, fixing errors and
enabling many SPIR-V features that were omitted earlier. And 15 LIT tests
are also added to demonstrate the new functionality.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129730
Co-authored-by: Aleksandr Bezzubikov <zuban32s@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Michal Paszkowski <michal.paszkowski@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: Andrey Tretyakov <andrey1.tretyakov@intel.com>
Co-authored-by: Konrad Trifunovic <konrad.trifunovic@intel.com>
This code confuses LV's "Uniform" and LVL/LAI's "Uniform". Despite the
common name, these are different.
* LVs notion means that only the first lane *of each unrolled part* is
required. That is, lanes within a single unroll factor are considered
uniform. This allows e.g. widenable memory ops to be considered
uses of uniform computations.
* LVL and LAI's notion refers to all lanes across all unrollings.
IsUniformMem is in turn defined in terms of LAI's notion. Thus a
UniformMemOpmeans is a memory operation with a loop invariant address.
This means the same address is accessed in every iteration.
The tweaked piece of code was trying to match a uniform mem op (i.e.
fully loop invariant address), but instead checked for LV's notion of
uniformity. In theory, this meant with UF > 1, we could speculate
a load which wasn't safe to execute.
This ends up being mostly silent in current code as it is nearly
impossible to create the case where this difference is visible. The
closest I've come in the test case from 54cb87, but even then, the
incorrect result is only visible in the vplan debug output; before this
change we sink the unsafely speculated load back into the user's predicate
blocks before emitting IR. Both before and after IR are correct so the
differences aren't "interesting".
The other test changes are uninteresting. They're cases where LV's uniform
analysis is slightly weaker than SCEV isLoopInvariant.
We can always fold zext.b since it is just andi. The others require
Zba/Zbb.
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130302
