When the initial relationship between two pairs of values between
similar sections is ambiguous to commutativity, arguments to the
outlined functions can be passed in such that the order is incorrect,
causing miscompilations. This adds a canonical mapping to each
similarity section, so that we can maintain the relationship of global
value numbering from one section to another.
Added Tests:
Transforms/IROutliner/outlining-commutative-operands-opposite-order.ll
unittests/Analysis/IRSimilarityIdentifierTest.cpp - IRSimilarityCandidate:CanonicalNumbering
Reviewers: jroelofs, jpaquette, yroux
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104143
The default value of the now deprecated
AllowAllConstructorInitializersOnNextLine was always true
regardless of the value of BasedOnStyle. This patch fixes the typo
in the code that handles the related backward compatibility.
This is another followup to D106591. Even if there is an
instruction that clobbers one of the loads, this doesn't matter if
it happens before the loads. Those instructions aren't affected by
the transform at all.
The gep-references-bb.ll is modified to preserve the spirit of the
test, as the store to @g no longer impacts the transform.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108782
We'd added support a while back from breaking the backedge if SCEV can prove the trip count is zero. However, we used the exact trip count which requires *all* exits be analyzeable. I noticed while writing test cases for another patch that this disallows cases where one exit is provably taken paired with another which is unknown. This patch adds the upper bound case.
We could use a symbolic max trip count here instead, but we use an isKnownNonZero filter (presumably for compile time?) for the first-iteration reasoning. I decided this was a more obvious incremental step, and we could go back and untangle the schemes separately.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108833
The Fuchsia build compiles the libc and test code with lots
of warnings enabled, including all the integer conversion warnings.
There was some sloppy type usage here that triggered some of those.
Reviewed By: michaelrj
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108800
In this mode libc++ headers end up in two directories:
* include/<triple>/c++/v1 for the site config header
* include/c++/v1 for everything else
Also switch from -I to -isystem.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108841
IIUC we can't emit `memcmp` between pointers in addressspaces,
doing so will trigger an assertion since the signature of the memcmp
will not match it's arguments (https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48661).
This PR disables the attempt to merge icmps,
when the pointer is in an addressspace.
Reviewed By: #julialang, vtjnash
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94813
Replace D107203, because __llvm_profile_set_file_object is usually used when the
process doesn't have permission to open/create file. That patch trying to copy
from old profile to new profile contradicts with the usage.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108242
Add a new --order option to choose between available test orders:
the default "smart" order, predictable "lexical" order or "random"
order. Default to using lexical order and one job in the lit test
suite.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107695
LLVM 13.0.0-rc2 shows change of behaviour in enum and interface BraceWrapping (likely before we simply didn't wrap) but may be related to {D99840}
Logged as https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51640
This change ensure AfterEnum works for
`internal|public|protected|private enum A {` in the same way as it works for `enum A {` in C++
A similar issue was also observed with `interface` in C#
Reviewed By: krasimir, owenpan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108810
Recursion can happen when we see a PHI use the second time or when we
look at a store value operand use again. We already visited the
potential copies and doing so again will just cause endless looping.
Reviewed By: kuter
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108190
For now we do should not treat byval arguments as local copies performed
on the call edge, though, in general we should. To make that happen we
need to teach various passes, e.g., DSE, about the copy effect of a
byval. That would also allow us to mark functions only accessing byval
arguments as readnone again, atguably their acceses have no effect
outside of the function, like accesses to allocas.
Reviewed By: kuter
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108140
This seem to be a regression caused by this change:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D60943.
Since we delayed report the error, we would run into some invalid
state in clang and llvm.
Without this fix, clang would assert when passing function into
inline asm's input operand.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107941
Changes since aec08e:
* Adjust placement of a closing brace so that the general case actually runs. Turns out we had *no* coverage of the switch case. I added one in eae90fd.
* Drop .llvm.loop.* metadata from the new branch as there is no longer a loop to annotate.
Original commit message:
This special cases an unconditional latch and a conditional branch latch exit to improve codegen and test readability. I am hoping to reuse this function in the runtime unroll code, but without this change, the test diffs are far too complex to assess.
This fixes another reproducer from https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51615
And again, the fix lies not in the code added in D105390
In this case, we completely don't check that the "broadcast-from-mem" we create
can actually fold the load. In this case, it's operand was not a load at all:
```
Combining: t16: v8i32 = vector_shuffle<0,u,u,u,0,u,u,u> t14, undef:v8i32
Creating new node: t29: i32 = undef
RepeatLoad:
t8: i32 = truncate t7
t7: i64 = extract_vector_elt t5, Constant:i64<0>
t5: v2i64,ch = load<(load (s128) from %ir.arg)> t0, t2, undef:i64
t2: i64,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i64 %0
t1: i64 = Register %0
t4: i64 = undef
t3: i64 = Constant<0>
Combining: t15: v8i32 = undef
```
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108821
This makes sure, that the text section will have a 2-byte alignment, if
the +c extension is enabled.
Reviewed By: MaskRay, luismarques
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102052
This adds an ELEN limit for fixed length vectors. This will scalarize
any elements larger than this. It will also disable some fractional
LMULs. For example, if ELEN=32 then mf8 becomes illegal, i32/f32
vectors can't use any fractional LMULs, i16/f16 can only use mf2,
and i8 can use mf2 and mf4.
We may also need something for the scalable vectors, but that has
interactions with the intrinsics and we can't scalarize a scalable
vector.
Longer term this should come from one of the Zve* features
We will try to use GetSystemTimePreciseAsFileTime if possible.
Reference: 59195b2d7f/.
Reviewed By: compnerd, #libc, mstorsjo, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104987
This was reduced from a test case which triggered a revert to my recent change to same function. It turns out we didn't have *any* coverage of the non-branch latch and my patch was blatantly broken.
We don't use double underscores for private header names when they are
in a subdirectory with double underscores already.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108820
added new command "process trace save -d <directory>".
-it saves a JSON file as <directory>/trace.json, with the main properties of the trace session.
-it saves binary Intel-pt trace as <directory>/thread_id.trace; each file saves each thread.
-it saves modules to the directory <directory>/modules .
-it only works for live process and it only support Intel-pt right now.
Example:
```
b main
run
process trace start
n
process trace save -d /tmp/mytrace
```
A file named trace.json and xxx.trace should be generated in /tmp/mytrace. To load the trace that was just saved:
```
trace load /tmp/mytrace
thread trace dump instructions
```
You should see the instructions of the trace got printed.
To run a test:
```
cd ~/llvm-sand/build/Release/fbcode-x86_64/toolchain
ninja lldb-dotest
./bin/lldb-dotest -p TestTraceSave
```
Reviewed By: wallace
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107669
Similar to D97976.
On Linux, most GCC installations are configured with
`--enable-gnu-unique-object` and such GCC emits `@gnu_unique_object` assembly.
The feature is highly controversial and disliked by many folks.
(On glibc DF_1_NODELETE is implicitly enabled and makes dlclose a no-op).
In llvm-project STB_GNU_UNIQUE is assembly only. Clang does not use STB_GNU_UNIQUE.
Use ELFOSABI_GNU to match GNU as behavior and avoid collision with other
OSABI binding values.
Reviewed By: jrtc27
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107861
The gn build doesn't support xray, so there's no reason to make the xray
headers available. Some CMake checks check if xray includes are
available to determine if xray is usable. Since we don't build the xray
runtime, there are link errors.
Reviewed By: thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108737
Add a new option PackConstructorInitializers and deprecate the
related options ConstructorInitializerAllOnOneLineOrOnePerLine and
AllowAllConstructorInitializersOnNextLine. Below is the mapping:
PackConstructorInitializers ConstructorInitializer... AllowAll...
Never - -
BinPack false -
CurrentLine true false
NextLine true true
The option value Never fixes PR50549 by always placing each
constructor initializer on its own line.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108752
We currently complain "could not open /LTCG: no such file or directory",
which isn't very useful. We could emit a warning when we see this flag, but
just ignoring it seems fine.
Final missing part of PR38799.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108799
MallocOverflow works in two phases:
1) Collects suspicious malloc calls, whose argument is a multiplication
2) Filters the aggregated list of suspicious malloc calls by iterating
over the BasicBlocks of the CFG looking for comparison binary
operators over the variable constituting in any suspicious malloc.
Consequently, it suppressed true-positive cases when the comparison
check was after the malloc call.
In this patch the checker will consider the relative position of the
relation check to the malloc call.
E.g.:
```lang=C++
void *check_after_malloc(int n, int x) {
int *p = NULL;
if (x == 42)
p = malloc(n * sizeof(int)); // Previously **no** warning, now it
// warns about this.
// The check is after the allocation!
if (n > 10) {
// Do something conditionally.
}
return p;
}
```
Reviewed By: martong
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107804
We try to forward a stored-once-constant-value from one global access
to another, but that's not safe if the constant value is an expression
that can trap.
The tests are reduced from the miscompile examples in:
https://llvm.org/PR47578
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108771
