The emplace commands are variadic and should take all the constructor arguments directly, since they implicitly call the constructor themselves in order to avoid the cost of constructing and then moving/copying temporaries.
Reviewed By: aartbik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108670
When padding quantized operations, the padding needs to equal the zero point
of the input value. Corrected the pass to change the padding value if quantized.
Reviewed By: NatashaKnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108440
Add notes for discarding private-visible functions in the Toy tutorial chapter 4.
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108026
Recent changes outside sparse compiler exposed the requirement of running a
new pass (lower-affine) but this only became apparent with private testing.
By adding some vectorized runs to integration test, we will detect the need
for such changes earlier and also widen codegen coverage of course.
Reviewed By: gussmith23
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108667
This canonicalization simplifies affine.min operations inside "for loop"-like operations (e.g., scf.for and scf.parallel) based on two invariants:
* iv >= lb
* iv < lb + step * ((ub - lb - 1) floorDiv step) + 1
This commit adds a new pass `canonicalize-scf-affine-min` (instead of being a canonicalization pattern) to avoid dependencies between the Affine dialect and the SCF dialect.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107731
Introduces new Ops to represent 1. alias.scope metadata in LLVM, and 2. domains for these scopes. These correspond to the metadata described in https://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#noalias-and-alias-scope-metadata. Lists of scopes are modeled the same way as access groups - as an ArrayAttr on the Op (added in https://reviews.llvm.org/D97944).
Lowering 'noalias' attributes on function parameters is already supported. However, lowering `noalias` metadata on individual Ops is not, which is added in this change. LLVM uses the same keyword for these, but this change introduces a separate attribute name 'noalias_scopes' to represent this distinct concept.
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107870
I found myself typing this code several times at different places
by now, so time to make this a general utility instead. Given
a permutation, it returns the permuted position of the input,
for example (i,j,k) -> (k,i,j) yields position 1 for input 0.
Reviewed By: ftynse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108347
If additional static type information can be deduced from a insert_slice's size operands, insert an explicit cast of the op's source operand.
This enables other canonicalization patterns that are matching for tensor_cast ops such as `ForOpTensorCastFolder` in SCF.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108617
Rationale:
Passing in a pointer to the memref data in order to implement the
dense to sparse conversion was a bit too low-level. This revision
improves upon that approach with a cleaner solution of generating
a loop nest in MLIR code itself that prepares the COO object before
passing it to our "swiss army knife" setup. This is much more
intuitive *and* now also allows for dynamic shapes.
Reviewed By: bixia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108491
This revision adds native ODS support for VariadicOfVariadic operand
groups. An example of this is the SwitchOp, which has a variadic number
of nested operand ranges for each of the case statements, where the
number of case statements is variadic. Builtin ODS support allows for
generating proper accessors for the nested operand ranges, builder
support, and declarative format support. VariadicOfVariadic operands
are supported by providing a segment attribute to use to store the
operand groups, mapping similarly to the AttrSizedOperand trait
(but with a user defined attribute name).
`build` methods for VariadicOfVariadic operand expect inputs of the
form `ArrayRef<ValueRange>`. Accessors for the variadic ranges
return a new `OperandRangeRange` type, which represents a
contiguous range of `OperandRange`. In the declarative assembly
format, VariadicOfVariadic operands and types are by default
formatted as a comma delimited list of value lists:
`(<value>, <value>), (), (<value>)`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107774
This allows for inlining into an empty block or to the beginning of a block. NFC as the existing implementations now foward to this overload.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108572
This revision fixes a bug where an operation would get replaced with
a pre-existing constant that didn't dominate it. This can occur when
a pattern inserts operations to be folded at the beginning of the
constants insertion block. This revision fixes the bug by moving the
existing constant before the replaced operation in such cases. This is
fine because if a constant didn't already exist, a new one would have
been inserted before this operation anyways.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108498
Do not apply loop peeling to loops that are contained in the partial iteration of an already peeled loop. This is to avoid code explosion when dealing with large loop nests. Can be controlled with a new pass option `skip-partial`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108542
* This is the native data layout for PyTorch and npcomp was using the prior version before cleanup.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108527
* Resolves a TODO by making this configurable by downstreams.
* This seems to be the last thing allowing full use of the Python bindings as a library within another project (i.e. be embedding them).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108523
Presently, the lowering of nested scf.parallel loops to OpenMP creates one omp.parallel region, with two (nested) OpenMP worksharing loops on the inside. When lowered to LLVM and executed, this results in incorrect results. The reason for this is as follows:
An OpenMP parallel region results in the code being run with whatever number of threads available to OpenMP. Within a parallel region a worksharing loop divides up the total number of requested iterations by the available number of threads, and distributes accordingly. For a single ws loop in a parallel region, this works as intended.
Now consider nested ws loops as follows:
omp.parallel {
A: omp.ws %i = 0...10 {
B: omp.ws %j = 0...10 {
code(%i, %j)
}
}
}
Suppose we ran this on two threads. The first workshare loop would decide to execute iterations 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 on thread 0, and iterations 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 on thread 1. The second workshare loop would decide the same for its iteration. This means thread 0 would execute i \in [0, 5) and j \in [0, 5). Thread 1 would execute i \in [5, 10) and j \in [5, 10). This means that iterations i in [5, 10), j in [0, 5) and i in [0, 5), j in [5, 10) never get executed, which is clearly wrong.
This permits two options for a remedy:
1) Change the semantics of the omp.wsloop to be distinct from that of the OpenMP runtime call or equivalently #pragma omp for. This could then allow some lowering transformation to remedy the aforementioned issue. I don't think this is desirable for an abstraction standpoint.
2) When lowering an scf.parallel always surround the wsloop with a new parallel region (thereby causing the innermost wsloop to use the number of threads available only to it).
This PR implements the latter change.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108426
Multiple operations were still defined as TC ops that had equivalent versions
as YAML operations. Reducing to a single compilation path guarantees that
frontends can lower to their equivalent operations without missing the
optimized fastpath.
Some operations are maintained purely for testing purposes (mainly conv{1,2,3}D
as they are included as sole tests in the vectorizaiton transforms.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108169
Folding in the MLIR uses the order of the type directly
but folding in the underlying implementation must take
the dim ordering into account. These tests clarify that
behavior and verify it is done right.
Reviewed By: bixia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108474
The boilerplate was setting up some arrays for testing. To fully illustrate
python - MLIR potential, however, this data should also come from numpy land.
Reviewed By: bixia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108336
Tosa rescale can contain uint8 types. Added support for these types
using an unrealized conversion cast. Optimistically it would be better to
use bitcast however it does not support unsigned integers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108427
Previously, ExecuteRegionOps with multiple return values would fail a round-trip test due to missing parenthesis around the types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108402
Apply the "for loop peeling" pattern from SCF dialect transforms. This pattern splits scf.for loops into full and partial iterations. In the full iteration, all masked loads/stores are canonicalized to unmasked loads/stores.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107733
Simplify affine.min ops, enabling various other canonicalizations inside the peeled loop body.
affine.min ops such as:
```
map = affine_map<(d0)[s0, s1] -> (s0, -d0 + s1)>
%r = affine.min #affine.min #map(%iv)[%step, %ub]
```
are rewritten them into (in the case the peeled loop):
```
%r = %step
```
To determine how an affine.min op should be rewritten and to prove its correctness, FlatAffineConstraints is utilized.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107222
This shares more code with existing utilities. Also, to be consistent,
we moved dimension permutation on the DimOp to the tensor lowering phase.
This way, both pre-existing DimOps on sparse tensors (not likely but
possible) as well as compiler generated DimOps are handled consistently.
Reviewed By: bixia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108309
Its possible for the clamp to have invalid min/max values on its range. To fix
this we validate the range of the min/max and clamp to a valid range.
Reviewed By: NatashaKnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108256
LLVM considers global variables marked as externals to be defined within the module if it is initialized (including to an undef). Other external globals are considered as being defined externally and imported into the current translation unit. Lowering of MLIR Global Ops does not properly propagate undefined initializers, resulting in a global which is expected to be defined within the current TU, not being defined.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108252
