The test case would check if "btrfs subvolume create":
- Report error on an existing path
- Still report error if mulitple paths are given and one of them already
exists
- For above case, still created a subvolume for the good parameter
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The test case would verify the following behaviors:
- Partial failure
Should return 1, but the remaining valid destinations would still be
created.
- All success
That's as usual.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Since a few days the CI started to fail randomly when there were loop
devices used in the tests. The mount fails because some device is
reported to be missing:
$ losetup --show --find
/dev/loop3
...
$ mkfs ...
ERROR: device scan failed on '/dev/loop3': No such file or directory
...
$ mount
mount: /home/runner/work/btrfs-progs/btrfs-progs/tests/mnt: wrong fs
type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/loop3, missing codepage or
helper program, or other error.
$ dmesg
...
BTRFS error (device loop0): devid 3 uuid 11d9c345-9527-433e-a024-7102659fa0ee is missing
BTRFS error (device loop0): failed to read the system array: -2
BTRFS error (device loop0): open_ctree failed
This was reproducible in the "cli" tests, but also happened on a local
machine.
To fix that wait for all loop devices before mount, the command
'btrfs device ready' should block until that. The convenience helper
does that, for any standalone 'mount' used with loop devices this must
be done manually.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The test names 011 and 012 are the same but 012 is actually testing
recursion of the 'btrfs fi du' command.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
There was a support for a short syntax of 'btrfs balance' that accepted
a path where normally would be the mandatory subcommand. This was a
heuristic and nowadays everybody should be using the
'btrfs balance action' syntax. The warning was in place for a year, it's
time to remove the short syntax completely.
Issue: #517
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
There are reports that json output of 'qgroup show' crashes due to
internal error when printing the limit values:
INTERNAL ERROR: unknown unit base, mode 2304
btrfs(internal_error+0x10a)[0x5605c37ce48a]
btrfs(pretty_size_snprintf+0x5c)[0x5605c37d105c]
btrfs(fmt_print+0x44e)[0x5605c37d178e]
btrfs(+0x7ed1d)[0x5605c3800d1d]
btrfs(main+0x8f)[0x5605c379beff]
/lib64/libc.so.6(+0x27bb0)[0x7f83924ddbb0]
/lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0x8b)[0x7f83924ddc79]
btrfs(_start+0x25)[0x5605c379d405]
common/units.c:82: pretty_size_snprintf: Assertion `0` failed, value 0
btrfs(+0x1d4b1)[0x5605c379f4b1]
btrfs(pretty_size_snprintf+0x7b)[0x5605c37d107b]
btrfs(fmt_print+0x44e)[0x5605c37d178e]
btrfs(+0x7ed1d)[0x5605c3800d1d]
btrfs(main+0x8f)[0x5605c379beff]
/lib64/libc.so.6(+0x27bb0)[0x7f83924ddbb0]
/lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0x8b)[0x7f83924ddc79]
btrfs(_start+0x25)[0x5605c379d405]
This is caused by "size" format that requires the unit mode, but it was not
specified and some stack value used. As json prints the raw values, use
the plain %llu format.
Link: https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1206960
Link: https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1209136#c15
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Executing the script inside the directories as './test.sh' is not
supposed to work but could happen accidentally. With an exit after
attempting to source the we can fix that.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
On a 32bit host the split qgroupid is wrong due to the way the numbers
are passed to the formatter as variable length arguments. The level is
u16, promoted to int and then parsed as u64. This means that the values
are shifted and some stack data are printed instead.
Example error messages from yast2-bootloader:
SystemCmd.cc(addLine):569 Adding Line 7 " "qgroupid": "21474836480/23885859321282560","
The value 21474836480 = 0x5000000 is 0x5 shifted by 32 bits,
23885859321282560 is 0x54dc1000000000 and shifting by 32 does not
lead to a valid value which should be 0 in this case.
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209136
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[BUG]
Test case cli/017 fails with the following errors:
[TEST] cli-tests.sh
[TEST/cli] 017-fi-show-missing
didn't find exact missing device
test failed for case 017-fi-show-missing
[CAUSE]
After kernel commit cb3e217bdb39 ("btrfs: use btrfs_dev_name() helper to
handle missing devices better"), all dev info ioctl call on missing
device would only return "<missing disk>" for its path.
Thus "btrfs filesystem show" would never report detailed device path for
missing disks.
[FIX]
Instead of relying on the device path, change the check to rely on devid
instead.
Now cli/017 can properly pass.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Add a test to ensure that 'btrfs fi show' on a mounted filesystem, which
has a missing device will explicitly print which device is missing.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
There was a regression in version 5.15 due to changes in how the ratio
for the various raid profiles got calculated and this in turn had a
cascading effect on unallocated/allocated space reported.
Add a test to ensure this regression doesn't occur again.
Issue: #422
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Add a test case which ensures that when resize is tried on an image
instead of a directory appropriate warning is produced and the command
fails.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The test fails inside travis, check for a multiple-profile detection.
This was verified to work on a proper host so the workaround is in place
let the whole suite pass.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Use simpler output format for easier parsing and place each block group
type on a separate line.
Example output:
WARNING: Multiple block group profiles detected, see 'man btrfs(5)'.
WARNING: Data: single, raid1
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Several commands now warn about multiple profiles as it is considered a
potentially problematic filesystem state that might need user attention.
- device delete
- device add
- balance pause
- balance cancel
- filesystem usage
WARNING: Multiple profiles detected. See 'man btrfs(5)'.
WARNING: data -> [raid1, single]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Skip the test 013-subvolume-delete-by-id if the first valid attempt to
use the ioctl fails with 'Inappropriate ioctl for device'.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The manual page of btrfsck clearly states 'btrfs check --repair' is a
dangerous operation.
Although this warning is in place users do not read the manual page
and/or are used to the behaviour of fsck utilities which repair the
filesystem, and thus potentially cause harm.
Similar to 'btrfs balance' without any filters, add a warning and a
countdown, so users can bail out before eventual corrupting the
filesystem more than it already is.
To override the timeout, let --force skip it and continue.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The 'max' keyword checks were missing. We care about correct parsing,
not necessarily the exact result of the filesystem resize.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Move the full-balance warning to before the fork, so that the user can
see and react to it.
Notes on test:
- Don't use grep -q, as it causes a SIGPIPE during the countdown, and
the balance thus doesn't start.
- The "balance cancel" is superfluous as the last command, but it
provides some idempotence and allows adding more tests below it.
Issue: #168
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Panteleev <git@vladimir.panteleev.md>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
grep's exit code was never checked (and -o errexit is not in effect),
thus the test was ineffectual and regressed.
Add the missing exit code check, and update the error messages to
make the test pass again.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Panteleev <git@vladimir.panteleev.md>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The documentation lacks clarity about depth to which recursive
'fi du' goes, and was pointed out by a user.
Add test that creates another mount inside a filesystem and verifies
that 'fi du' does not go there.
Issue: #185
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The documentation lacks clarity about depth to which recursive
defragmentation go, and was pointed out by a user.
The problem here is that the subvolume behaves the same as mount point
regarding path traversal. The nftw stops on mount boundary (FTW_MOUNT).
Add test that verifies this behaviour. Defrag has to be updated to allow
descending to subvolumes (and not mountpoints).
Issue: #185
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Use TEST_TOP as base for tests to reference any files, this will be used
for git and external testsuite.
INTERNAL_BIN is needed for referencing binaries that could reside in
different paths in git vs external testsuite.
Signed-off-by: Gu Jinxiang <gujx@cn.fujitsu.com>
[ add quotes around sourced files, update changelog ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Add new test to check functionality of subvol get/set-default.
Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Misono <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
[ fix style issues, add missing SUDO_HELPER ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The sanity check in run_mustfail does not work as expected and allowed
the command to continue without the missing parameter
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196893
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Simple test script for the following patch.
btrfs-progs: qgroup: add sync option to 'qgroup show'
Signed-off-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
